# William J. Bowman | Home

wjb

William J. Bowman is finishing his Ph.D. in computer science (studying programming languages) at Northeastern University, and will be starting as an Assistant Professor at University of British Columbia in Jan. 2019. Broadly speaking, he is interested in making it easier for programmers to communicate their intent to machines, and preserving that intent through the stages of compilation. More specifically, his research interests include secure and verified compilation, dependently typed programming, verification, meta-programming, and interoperability. His recent work examines type-preserving compilation of dependently typed programming language like Coq, a technique that can enable preserving security and correctness invariants of verified software through compilation and statically enforcing those invariants in the low-level (assembly-like) code generated by compilers.

## Manuscripts

Dependent Type Systems as Macros.

Stephen Chang, Michael Ballantyne, Marcela Poffald, William J. Bowman

2018.

Increasingly, programmers want the power of dependent types, yet significant
expertise is still required to write realistic dependently-typed programs.
Domain-specific languages (DSLs) attempting to tame dependent types have
proliferated, adding notation and tools tailored to a problem domain, but these
only shift the problem, as implementing such languages requires at least as much
expertise as using dependent types.

We show how to lower the burden for implementing dependently-typed languages and
DSLs, using a classic approach to DSL implementation not typically associated
with typed languages—

We evaluate our approach by building three languages in different parts of the
design space:
first, a video-editing DSL with a Dependent ML-like type system,
demonstrating that our approach accommodates “lightweight” dependent types;
second, we gradually extend MLTT to the Calculus of Inductive Constructions,
demonstrating that our approach is modular, and scales to “heavyweight”
dependent type systems; and, finally, Cur, a prototype proof assistant with a
similar design to Coq, which supports new notation and an extensible tactic
language, demonstrating that our approach scales to creating realistic
dependently-typed proof assistants.

Compiling Dependent Types Without Continuations.

William J. Bowman and Amal Ahmed

2018.

Type-preserving compilation of dependently typed languages preserves the
correctness specifications (encoded in types) and proofs from languages such as
Coq through compilation.
This enables checking that programs still meet their specification after
compilation, and allows enforcing specifications at link time via type
checking.
Unfortunately, the standard approach to making control flow explicit in a
type-preserving compiler is the continuation-passing style (CPS) transformation,
which does not work well in dependent type theory.
In fact, until recently, preserving dependent types through CPS translation was
thought impossible, and even recent successful approaches do not scale well in
general.
For example, they require eliding types like strong dependent pairs from the
source language, require non-standard typed target languages, do not support an
infinite predicative universe hierarchy, or do not have decidable type checking
in the target language.

In this work, we present a type-preserving A-normal form (ANF)
transformation—

## Conference Publications

Typed Closure Conversion of the Calculus of Constructions.

William J. Bowman and Amal Ahmed

In Proc. of the Conference on Programming Language Implementation and
Design (PLDI 2018).

Dependently typed languages such as Coq are used to specify and verify the full functional
correctness of source programs.
Type-preserving compilation can be used to preserve these specifications and proofs of correctness
through compilation into the generated target-language programs.
Unfortunately, type-preserving compilation of dependent types is hard.
In essence, the problem is that dependent type systems are designed around high-level compositional abstractions
to decide type checking, but compilation interferes with the type-system rules for reasoning about
run-time terms.

We develop a type-preserving closure-conversion translation from the Calculus of Constructions
(CC) with strong dependent pairs (Σ types)—

Type-Preserving CPS Translation of Σ and Π Types is Not Not Possible.

William J. Bowman, Youyou Cong, Nick Rioux, and Amal Ahmed

In Proc. of the Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL 2018)

Dependently typed languages such as Coq are used to specify and prove functional correctness of source
programs, but what we ultimately need are guarantees about correctness of compiled code.
By preserving dependent types through each compiler pass, we could preserve source-level
specifications and correctness proofs into the generated target-language programs.
Unfortunately, type-preserving compilation of dependent types is a challenging problem.
In 2002, Barthe and Uustalu showed that type-preserving CPS is \emph{not possible} for languages such as
Coq.
Specifically, they showed that for strong dependent pairs ($\Sigma$ types), the standard typed
call-by-name CPS is \emph{not type preserving}.
They further proved that for dependent case analysis on sums, a class of typed CPS
translations—

In this paper, we prove that type-preserving CPS translation for dependently typed languages is
\emph{not} not possible.
We develop both call-by-name and call-by-value CPS translations from the Calculus of Constructions
with both $\Pi$ and $\Sigma$ types (CC) to a dependently typed target language, and prove type
preservation and compiler correctness of each translation.
Our target language is CC extended with an additional equivalence rule and an additional typing rule,
which we prove consistent by giving a model in the extensional Calculus of Constructions.
Our key observation is that we can use a CPS translation that employs \emph{answer-type polymorphism},
where CPS-translated computations have type $\forall \alpha. (A \rightarrow \alpha) \rightarrow
\alpha$.
This type justifies, by a \emph{free theorem}, the new equality rule in our target language and allows
us to recover the term/type equivalences that CPS translation disrupts.
Finally, we conjecture that our translation extends to dependent case analysis on sums, despite the
impossibility result, and provide a proof sketch.

Fully Abstract Compilation via Universal Embedding.

Max New, William J. Bowman, and Amal Ahmed.

In Proc. of the International Conference on Functional
Programming (ICFP 2016)

A fully abstract compiler guarantees that two source components
are observationally equivalent in the source language if and only if
their translations are observationally equivalent in the target.
Full abstraction implies the translation is secure: target-language
attackers can make no more observations of a compiled component than a
source-language attacker interacting with the original source
component.
Proving full abstraction for realistic compilers is challenging because
realistic target languages contain features (such as control effects)
unavailable in the source, while proofs of full abstraction require showing
that every target context to which a compiled component may be linked can be
back-translated to a behaviorally equivalent source context.

We prove the first full abstraction result for a translation whose target
language contains exceptions, but the source does not.
Our translation—

Noninterference for Free.

William J. Bowman, and Amal Ahmed.

In Proc. of the International Conference on Functional
Programming (ICFP 2015)

Abadi et. al. (1999) introduced the dependency core calculus
(DCC) as a framework for studying a variety of dependency analyses
(e.g., secure information flow). The key property provided by DCC is
noninterference, which guarantees that a low-level observer
(attacker) cannot distinguish high-level (protected) computations.
The proof of noninterference for DCC suggests a connection to
parametricity in System F, which suggests that it should be possible
to implement dependency analyses in languages with parametric
polymorphism.

In this paper, we present a translation from DCC into Fω and
prove that the translation preserves noninterference. To express
noninterference in Fω we define a notion of observer-sensitive
equivalence that makes essential use of both first-order and
higher-order polymorphism. Our translation provides insights into
DCC’s type system and shows how DCC can be implemented in a
polymorphic language without loss of the security/noninterference
guarantees available in DCC. Our contributions include proof
techniques that should be valuable when proving other secure
compilation or full abstraction results.Abstract |
Paper |
Technical Appendix |
ICFP 2015 Talk (by me) |
Slides |
Author-Izer

Profile-Guided Meta-Programming.

William J. Bowman, Swaha Miller, Vincent St-Amour, and R. Kent Dybvig.

In Proc. of the Conference on Programming Language Implementation and
Design (PLDI 2015).

Contemporary compiler systems such as GCC, .NET, and LLVM incorporate
profile-guided optimizations (PGOs) on low-level intermediate code and
basic blocks, with impressive results over purely static heuristics.
Recent work shows that profile information is also useful for performing
source-to-source optimizations via meta-programming.
For example, using profiling information to inform decisions about data
structures and algorithms can potentially lead to asymptotic
improvements in performance.

We present a design for profile-guided meta-programming in a
general-purpose meta-programming system.
Our design is parametric over the particular profiler and
meta-programming system.
We implement this design in two different meta-programming systems—

## Workshop Publications

Dependently Typed Assembly and Secure Linking (short talk)

William J. Bowman.

Talk at the Workshop on Principles of Secure Compilation (PriSC 2018).

Type-preserving compilation is used to statically enforce safety and security properties through
type checking.
The idea is to design strongly typed compiler target languages, preserve type information through the
compiler, then use the types in the target language to enforce invariants when linking with untrusted
code.
Unfortunately, this technique is limited by the expressiveness of the target type system, and existing
simple and polymorphic typed assembly languages cannot express all security invariants we wish to
enforce.
Dependent types could be used to express safety, security, and full functional correctness invariants.
In this talk, I briefly describe work-in-progress on developing a dependently typed assembly, and how
it could be used to statically enforce security guarantees when linking.Abstract |
Slides

Only Control Effects and Dependent Types.

Youyou Cong, William J. Bowman.

Talk at the Workshop on Higher-order Programming with Effects (HOPE
2017).

Abstract |
GitHub

Growing a Proof Assistant.

William J. Bowman.

Talk at the Workshop on Higher-order Programming with Effects (HOPE
2016).

Sophisticated domain-specific and user-defined notation is widely used in
formal models, but is poorly supported by proof assistants.
Many proof assistants support simple notation definitions, but no proof
assistant enables users to conveniently define sophisticated
notation.
For instance, in modeling a programming language, we often define infix
relations such as Γ ⊢ e : t and use BNF notation to specify the syntax
of the language.
In a proof assistant like Coq or Agda, users can easily define the notation
for Γ ⊢ e : t, but to use BNF notation the user must use a preprocessing
tool external to the proof assistant, which is cumbersome.

To support sophisticated user-defined notation, we propose to use
language extension as a fundamental part of the design of a proof
assistant.
We describe how to design a language-extension systems that support safe,
convenient, and sophisticated user-defined extensions, and how to design a
proof assistant based on language extension.
We evaluate this design by building a proof assistant that features a small
dependent type theory as the core language and implementing the following
extensions in small user-defined libraries: pattern matching for inductive
types, dependently-typed staged meta-programming, a tactic-based proof
language, and BNF and inference-rule notation for inductive type definitions.Abstract |
Draft Paper |
HOPE 2016 Talk (by me) |
GitHub

Dagger Traced Symmetric Monoidal Categories and Reversible Programming.

William J. Bowman, Roshan P. James, and Amr Sabry.

In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Reversible Computation (RC
2011).

Paper |
Code

## Talks

Compiling with Dependent Types

PhD Defense

William J. Bowman

Keynote |
PDF

Do Compilers Respect Programmers?

William J. Bowman

Video |
Keynote |
PDF

## Other

Toward Type Preserving Compilation of Coq.

William J. Bowman.

POPL 2017 Student Research Competition

Extended Abstract |
Poster